Maxine Waters as we have all heard has told American constituents who are against government prodigality to “go straight to hell”.
As their false prophet would say - “let me be clear” - this hate mongering SWINDLER, MAXINE WATERS, who bribed the US Treasury department and intervened with regulators on behalf of a bank to which she had personal financial ties INCLUDING HER HUSBAND’S $500,000 WORTH OF BANK STOCK - is a stain on the millions of black Americans who vote Democrat.
As far as I’m concerned SHE should GO STRAIGHT TO PRISON. Prison is EXACTLY where she BELONGS and exactly where she (like fellow scoundrel Charles Rangel) would be if she were a Republican.
This is just one of many examples of the contemptible rhetoric one would expect from a mouth piece of a third world dictator. This is quite a fitting description of what she -is- but she is also, sadly, a disgrace upon the government founded by our forefathers. It is embarassing to think that this women affects legislation that governs our entire nation.
Watters is truly poisoning the well of liberty and rapidly destroying the concept and viability of the federalist system.
MrArbitrage@tableofwisdom.com
Monday, August 22, 2011
Friday, August 12, 2011
August 12,2011
Chris Wallace proves he's MSNBC Material
by Thurston Howell
During the day long infomercial for Mitt Romney that is Fox News, I caught several appearances by Chris Wallace conducting damage control after the can of Whoop-ass Newt Gingrich opened upon him in last night’s GOP debate.
His political pundit colleagues were helping to prop him up by agreeing that his now infamous question was perfectly legitimate. They are all contending that asking Gingrich what he “has to say to people who say” that his “campaign is a disaster” – was not a “gotcha question”.
Wallace has a track record of insulting candidates he apparently dislikes by superficially framing his insults in the form of a question posed by generic people he fails to specifically identify beyond a group. His intent is transparent in the way that contestants on Jeopardy give an answer in the form of a question. Sure, technically it is a real question but that is a matter of procedure.
That these pundits actually don’t see the inappropriate nature of the question is hard to believe. Telling the man while he stands on the national stage waiting for a question about his positions on issues - that his campaign is a disaster and saying that “other people” say that - is pathetic and should be reserved for the tabloids. I love the way Gingrich enumerated on specific ideas on which he's campaigning - immediately after blasting this chump.
Wallace's claim that the question was about Newt's RECORD is absurd. His place in the polls during a campaign has nothing to do with his record.
Wallace did the same thing to Michelle Bachman recently when he asked her on his show “are you a flake”? Then too, he framed the underhanded insult by implying that it was those “other people” who contend this.
If simply framing his attacks by asserting that hypothetical “people” say whatever absurdity he chooses to propound makes the insult “legitimate”, he can say virtually ANYTHING he wants without scrutiny.
That is why the highlight of last night’s debate was when Gingrich put this pompous little twit in his place. No matter how much spin Wallace and his buddies try to put on it, the question was no more legitimate then if Gingrich would have asked Wallace what he has to say to people who say that he likes to dress up in his wife’s under-garments.
Judging from his pattern of scurrilous reproach toward his least favorite guests, nobody will ever mistake Chris Wallace of being a gentleman. In my opinion, Wallace once again demonstrated that he is clearly out of his league when trying to spar with Gingrich. This man is clearly MSNBC material.
Contact: mrarbitrage@tableofwisdom.com
Chris Wallace proves he's MSNBC Material
by Thurston Howell
During the day long infomercial for Mitt Romney that is Fox News, I caught several appearances by Chris Wallace conducting damage control after the can of Whoop-ass Newt Gingrich opened upon him in last night’s GOP debate.
His political pundit colleagues were helping to prop him up by agreeing that his now infamous question was perfectly legitimate. They are all contending that asking Gingrich what he “has to say to people who say” that his “campaign is a disaster” – was not a “gotcha question”.
Wallace has a track record of insulting candidates he apparently dislikes by superficially framing his insults in the form of a question posed by generic people he fails to specifically identify beyond a group. His intent is transparent in the way that contestants on Jeopardy give an answer in the form of a question. Sure, technically it is a real question but that is a matter of procedure.
That these pundits actually don’t see the inappropriate nature of the question is hard to believe. Telling the man while he stands on the national stage waiting for a question about his positions on issues - that his campaign is a disaster and saying that “other people” say that - is pathetic and should be reserved for the tabloids. I love the way Gingrich enumerated on specific ideas on which he's campaigning - immediately after blasting this chump.
Wallace's claim that the question was about Newt's RECORD is absurd. His place in the polls during a campaign has nothing to do with his record.
Wallace did the same thing to Michelle Bachman recently when he asked her on his show “are you a flake”? Then too, he framed the underhanded insult by implying that it was those “other people” who contend this.
If simply framing his attacks by asserting that hypothetical “people” say whatever absurdity he chooses to propound makes the insult “legitimate”, he can say virtually ANYTHING he wants without scrutiny.
That is why the highlight of last night’s debate was when Gingrich put this pompous little twit in his place. No matter how much spin Wallace and his buddies try to put on it, the question was no more legitimate then if Gingrich would have asked Wallace what he has to say to people who say that he likes to dress up in his wife’s under-garments.
Judging from his pattern of scurrilous reproach toward his least favorite guests, nobody will ever mistake Chris Wallace of being a gentleman. In my opinion, Wallace once again demonstrated that he is clearly out of his league when trying to spar with Gingrich. This man is clearly MSNBC material.
Contact: mrarbitrage@tableofwisdom.com
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
June 15, 2011
Netflix vs. "The Keystone Cable Cos."
by Thurston Howell
I’ve found it amusing the past week watching all of the headlines about the cable television executives having their meeting of the minds regarding their bleak futures and The Netflix Problem. I have long maintained that Comcast shareholders and CONSUMERS would be better off if Netflix and Reed Hastings could put together a highly leveraged buyout of Comcast.
I use a Comcast cable modem and watch movies ON Netflix without any technical difficulty. Yet, I’ve had Comcast “On Demand” for over a year now and every time I have ever tried to watch a program on it, the screen freezes like a DVD dipped in Molasses. It seems ironic that I watch movies without difficulty through the Comcast PIPELINE - yet Comcast can't deliver me a TV show on demand without invariable difficulty. I haven't been able to watch an entire show on demand yet!
I only use Comcast because they have fiber optic lines and the Internet service is better than DSL. As for Comcast as a CONTENT PROVIDER - it really disturbs me off how they make customers pay for trash like M-TV, VH-1 and other left wing propaganda channels most of us DON’T WATCH (an don't want our children watching). They need to get out of content & be seen as a utility and nothing more.
I get 99 channels and only watch 3 of them. The one OTHER channel that I WANT is the NFL Network. These swindlers tell me that I have to order a whole additional package of 30 MORE channels that I won’t watch, just so I can now have 4 channels that I actually watch.
The other TRASH channels that have long served to debauch morals and indoctrinate our youth wouldn’t even EXIST if it were not for these cable clowns breaching their fiduciary duties by running the companies to advance their own leftist agendas. Instead of giving customers what they want, they have for DECADES taken –disappointed customer’s money- and have paid M-TV and other propaganda networks for their trash, WHILE STICKING IT to you and me, essentially giving us the one finger salute. I have repeatedly pleaded with Comcast’s inept customer service department to vocalize my disenchantment, requesting they offer NFL Network in a basic package (the way the satellite services do). They outright LIE - and blame it on the NFL. But I get these ads in the mail offering me the ONE network I want – if I “upgrade”.
They have also lied to customerss about the feasibility of offering customers something remotely resembling an À la carte menu that would give us even a diminutive amount of choice as to our basic package. I’m not buying it. The upgrades give you many choices of various channels. They screw us on basic because they have a monopoly. My cable is through my “master homeowner’s association” so I pay for it without choice. To go out and subscribe to Direct TV when I’m already forced to pay for the Comcast monopoly makes as little economic sense as upgrading to the premium package so I can get -1- channel. My other option would be to move to another neighborhood that doesn’t have cable built into the association dues. It’s not quite practical.
This matter will be moot when these canle scoundrels are essentially driven to obsolescence. In the 90’s the hype was centered on tales of “500 channels!” as though we should be impressed. In a matter of a couple years, the whole notion of “channels” will be an unmitigated joke. The notion of channels and programming “schedules” will be laughed about like record stores. It’s all about content and anyone with a web domain will be able to produce and distribute their content as long as they can hold the interest of an audience. We will not need Comcast to offer us programming like the NFL Network. I know where the NFL website is and I will be able to go there and watch it through the Internet on my TV (if we still use the word TV).
The only thing I want those cable idiots for is a pipe to my home. I want bandwidth – that’s it. These people are far too incompetent to survive this. There will be some with enough acuity to survive as aggregators and even controlling content by helping to fund production. Those cable execs are in WAY over their heads in that game. That is why intelligent shareholders would want someone like Hastings and his team to run their companies.
I will revel in their demise. The TECHNOLOGY of cable is the ONLY worthwhile asset. The incompetent swindlers who currently RUN the cable companies are about as much an asset to shareholders as John Riggas and sons.
They should be in prison with Riggas truth be told. Get Reed Hastings in ... there and despite the leverage required for a Netflix acquisition – the value of these cable companies will rapidly escalate over the next decade.
Also, they need to either lower their prices for movies on demand. They would make up for it in volume. These geniuses just can't understand that the public has a price point for the average cost they're willing to pay per home movie - and cable companies exceed it. I believe that price is around $3.00 per. That is a major reason why they can't get critical mass and become the standard. They are their own worst enemy. - Thurston@ThurstonHowell.net
"cbPatriot.com is organizing an emergency communication plan for constitution venerating patriots. It's volunteer. Be prepared for what is coming. Don't count on your Internet and cell working when it all hits the fan." - Scott Ryan
http://www.cbPatriot.com
Netflix vs. "The Keystone Cable Cos."
by Thurston Howell
I’ve found it amusing the past week watching all of the headlines about the cable television executives having their meeting of the minds regarding their bleak futures and The Netflix Problem. I have long maintained that Comcast shareholders and CONSUMERS would be better off if Netflix and Reed Hastings could put together a highly leveraged buyout of Comcast.
I use a Comcast cable modem and watch movies ON Netflix without any technical difficulty. Yet, I’ve had Comcast “On Demand” for over a year now and every time I have ever tried to watch a program on it, the screen freezes like a DVD dipped in Molasses. It seems ironic that I watch movies without difficulty through the Comcast PIPELINE - yet Comcast can't deliver me a TV show on demand without invariable difficulty. I haven't been able to watch an entire show on demand yet!
I only use Comcast because they have fiber optic lines and the Internet service is better than DSL. As for Comcast as a CONTENT PROVIDER - it really disturbs me off how they make customers pay for trash like M-TV, VH-1 and other left wing propaganda channels most of us DON’T WATCH (an don't want our children watching). They need to get out of content & be seen as a utility and nothing more.
I get 99 channels and only watch 3 of them. The one OTHER channel that I WANT is the NFL Network. These swindlers tell me that I have to order a whole additional package of 30 MORE channels that I won’t watch, just so I can now have 4 channels that I actually watch.
The other TRASH channels that have long served to debauch morals and indoctrinate our youth wouldn’t even EXIST if it were not for these cable clowns breaching their fiduciary duties by running the companies to advance their own leftist agendas. Instead of giving customers what they want, they have for DECADES taken –disappointed customer’s money- and have paid M-TV and other propaganda networks for their trash, WHILE STICKING IT to you and me, essentially giving us the one finger salute. I have repeatedly pleaded with Comcast’s inept customer service department to vocalize my disenchantment, requesting they offer NFL Network in a basic package (the way the satellite services do). They outright LIE - and blame it on the NFL. But I get these ads in the mail offering me the ONE network I want – if I “upgrade”.
They have also lied to customerss about the feasibility of offering customers something remotely resembling an À la carte menu that would give us even a diminutive amount of choice as to our basic package. I’m not buying it. The upgrades give you many choices of various channels. They screw us on basic because they have a monopoly. My cable is through my “master homeowner’s association” so I pay for it without choice. To go out and subscribe to Direct TV when I’m already forced to pay for the Comcast monopoly makes as little economic sense as upgrading to the premium package so I can get -1- channel. My other option would be to move to another neighborhood that doesn’t have cable built into the association dues. It’s not quite practical.
This matter will be moot when these canle scoundrels are essentially driven to obsolescence. In the 90’s the hype was centered on tales of “500 channels!” as though we should be impressed. In a matter of a couple years, the whole notion of “channels” will be an unmitigated joke. The notion of channels and programming “schedules” will be laughed about like record stores. It’s all about content and anyone with a web domain will be able to produce and distribute their content as long as they can hold the interest of an audience. We will not need Comcast to offer us programming like the NFL Network. I know where the NFL website is and I will be able to go there and watch it through the Internet on my TV (if we still use the word TV).
The only thing I want those cable idiots for is a pipe to my home. I want bandwidth – that’s it. These people are far too incompetent to survive this. There will be some with enough acuity to survive as aggregators and even controlling content by helping to fund production. Those cable execs are in WAY over their heads in that game. That is why intelligent shareholders would want someone like Hastings and his team to run their companies.
I will revel in their demise. The TECHNOLOGY of cable is the ONLY worthwhile asset. The incompetent swindlers who currently RUN the cable companies are about as much an asset to shareholders as John Riggas and sons.
They should be in prison with Riggas truth be told. Get Reed Hastings in ... there and despite the leverage required for a Netflix acquisition – the value of these cable companies will rapidly escalate over the next decade.
Also, they need to either lower their prices for movies on demand. They would make up for it in volume. These geniuses just can't understand that the public has a price point for the average cost they're willing to pay per home movie - and cable companies exceed it. I believe that price is around $3.00 per. That is a major reason why they can't get critical mass and become the standard. They are their own worst enemy. - Thurston@ThurstonHowell.net
"cbPatriot.com is organizing an emergency communication plan for constitution venerating patriots. It's volunteer. Be prepared for what is coming. Don't count on your Internet and cell working when it all hits the fan." - Scott Ryan
http://www.cbPatriot.com
Friday, May 13, 2011
The Truth behind Gas Prices: Why the are going up while oil drops significantly
by Thurston Howell
Everywhere you go people are talking about gas prices. One of the most common questions: WHY does the price of gasoline IMMEDIATELY skyrocket at the pump the very day that oil prices –rise- but barely move when oil prices plunge?
That’s a reasonable question to ask as we all know that the price they paid for that gas already under ground didn’t cost them the new, higher closing price of that day.
They justify this by attributing the new higher price to “replacement cost”. In other words, we are going to charge you more in advance because we will have to replace this gas you are buying -now- with higher priced gas. That is disingenuous because they are still going to turn around and sell the new gas they buy at an even higher price with the same margin built into the new retail price. The gas isn’t going to expire in their holding tanks; so it isn’t going to go unsold.
Another related question: “Oil prices have fallen precipitously in recent weeks yet I am still seeing $4.00+ gas all around me.”
They are quick to jack up gas prices when oil goes up but never when it goes down. The reason according to a column titled “American OPEC” at http://www.tableofwisdom.com/ - is that the refiners are acting as a cartel in their own right, reducing the amount of gasoline supply to a level that will keep their profit margins higher. This will make the falling oil even more profitable for them because their profit spread will go higher on the gasoline sales after they buy more oil to refine at the lower prices.
This is about to become more egregious. The headline today is “U.S. refiners gear up to battle acts of nature”. According to Myra Saefong, “flooding on the Mississippi River and the upcoming start to Atlantic hurricane season have drawn U.S. refineries into the spotlight, raising the risks for operational disruptions at a time when retail prices for gasoline and diesel stand near record levels.”
Yet, this column doesn't mention that these opportunists have been refining at the lowest capacity utilization level in 30 years - driving gas prices near record highs despite oil being far off a record high of $147 a barrel. Columns like this simply provide these companies ADDITIONAL cover - and additional excuses to refine even LESS than at the ridiculous rate heretofore. Perhaps this time they will go for a record. Why not take refinery utilization down to 50% and just blame it on the floods.
They are going to milk this for all they can
Oil refiners have essentially been gang raping consumers for the past several months and it is potentially going to get much worse in coming days and weeks. I that sounds harsh but don’t shoot the messenger. There is no more adequate analogy for what is taking place. Outrage should be directed toward the perpetrators, not the people who report it.
This is all a part of a cycle. They do this because THEY CAN. They walk the line and they do it very closely. They manipulate and exploit the situation until the political rhetoric gets too hot, then they will ratchet down the gas prices – just in time.
What’s the alternative?
Soon we will begin to hear the jawboning of elected parasites threatening to “investigate” them. Are we to believe that these former ambulance chasers who are just as eager to exploit popular turmoil for their own personal gain are going to fix the problem? The same people who bribe the unions, the same people who sue our state governments for enforcing federal laws – these scoundrels are supposed to be trusted to fix the problem?
To get the federal parasites involved is a “cure” worse than the disease itself. It’s as sensible as bashing your skull with a hammer in order to forget your back ache. But while these oil companies are walking the line, thinking they are going to get away with the old charade as they have for decades, they better watch out. These are unprecedented times. The last meltdown was a mere dress rehearsal for what’s coming. With an electorate half of which has been so dumbed down by public indoctrination ala teachers union, they wouldn’t know the difference between Karl Marx and Adam Smith. So when the next government induced financial meltdown occurs, I fully expect that the Saboteur in Chief is going to attempt to nationalize the oil companies with the full approbation of these droids who elected him.
They are very angry and won’t see anything wrong with that. “But that’s what the communist countries do.” No matter; what’s a communist? “Chavez is a great guy and he’s a communist!” As long as the Saboteur doesn’t interrupt Dancing with the Stars and keeps the government checks coming, he can do whatever he wills.
The point that “big oil” may want to heed is this. Some of us know that the government bureaucrats who would attempt to “fix” the problem, suck far worse than you. If the Saboteur gets his hands on these companies, we’re looking at $10-$20 dollars a gallon like in corrupt, leftist regime. And most people would end up having to take public transportation or rickshaws. But that undeniable fact of human history confirmed by about 6,000 years of empirical evidence is all out the door with this idiocracy. Factual though it is, it will always be uncommon knowledge as long as there are ambitious people in this nation who wish to rule over the masses. Be careful.
Have an emergency communications plan together because civil unrest is coming. See the volunteer program called The CB Patriot Project at http://www.cbpatriot.com/ Get involved now.
by Thurston Howell
Everywhere you go people are talking about gas prices. One of the most common questions: WHY does the price of gasoline IMMEDIATELY skyrocket at the pump the very day that oil prices –rise- but barely move when oil prices plunge?
That’s a reasonable question to ask as we all know that the price they paid for that gas already under ground didn’t cost them the new, higher closing price of that day.
They justify this by attributing the new higher price to “replacement cost”. In other words, we are going to charge you more in advance because we will have to replace this gas you are buying -now- with higher priced gas. That is disingenuous because they are still going to turn around and sell the new gas they buy at an even higher price with the same margin built into the new retail price. The gas isn’t going to expire in their holding tanks; so it isn’t going to go unsold.
Another related question: “Oil prices have fallen precipitously in recent weeks yet I am still seeing $4.00+ gas all around me.”
They are quick to jack up gas prices when oil goes up but never when it goes down. The reason according to a column titled “American OPEC” at http://www.tableofwisdom.com/ - is that the refiners are acting as a cartel in their own right, reducing the amount of gasoline supply to a level that will keep their profit margins higher. This will make the falling oil even more profitable for them because their profit spread will go higher on the gasoline sales after they buy more oil to refine at the lower prices.
This is about to become more egregious. The headline today is “U.S. refiners gear up to battle acts of nature”. According to Myra Saefong, “flooding on the Mississippi River and the upcoming start to Atlantic hurricane season have drawn U.S. refineries into the spotlight, raising the risks for operational disruptions at a time when retail prices for gasoline and diesel stand near record levels.”
Yet, this column doesn't mention that these opportunists have been refining at the lowest capacity utilization level in 30 years - driving gas prices near record highs despite oil being far off a record high of $147 a barrel. Columns like this simply provide these companies ADDITIONAL cover - and additional excuses to refine even LESS than at the ridiculous rate heretofore. Perhaps this time they will go for a record. Why not take refinery utilization down to 50% and just blame it on the floods.
They are going to milk this for all they can
Oil refiners have essentially been gang raping consumers for the past several months and it is potentially going to get much worse in coming days and weeks. I that sounds harsh but don’t shoot the messenger. There is no more adequate analogy for what is taking place. Outrage should be directed toward the perpetrators, not the people who report it.
This is all a part of a cycle. They do this because THEY CAN. They walk the line and they do it very closely. They manipulate and exploit the situation until the political rhetoric gets too hot, then they will ratchet down the gas prices – just in time.
What’s the alternative?
Soon we will begin to hear the jawboning of elected parasites threatening to “investigate” them. Are we to believe that these former ambulance chasers who are just as eager to exploit popular turmoil for their own personal gain are going to fix the problem? The same people who bribe the unions, the same people who sue our state governments for enforcing federal laws – these scoundrels are supposed to be trusted to fix the problem?
To get the federal parasites involved is a “cure” worse than the disease itself. It’s as sensible as bashing your skull with a hammer in order to forget your back ache. But while these oil companies are walking the line, thinking they are going to get away with the old charade as they have for decades, they better watch out. These are unprecedented times. The last meltdown was a mere dress rehearsal for what’s coming. With an electorate half of which has been so dumbed down by public indoctrination ala teachers union, they wouldn’t know the difference between Karl Marx and Adam Smith. So when the next government induced financial meltdown occurs, I fully expect that the Saboteur in Chief is going to attempt to nationalize the oil companies with the full approbation of these droids who elected him.
They are very angry and won’t see anything wrong with that. “But that’s what the communist countries do.” No matter; what’s a communist? “Chavez is a great guy and he’s a communist!” As long as the Saboteur doesn’t interrupt Dancing with the Stars and keeps the government checks coming, he can do whatever he wills.
The point that “big oil” may want to heed is this. Some of us know that the government bureaucrats who would attempt to “fix” the problem, suck far worse than you. If the Saboteur gets his hands on these companies, we’re looking at $10-$20 dollars a gallon like in corrupt, leftist regime. And most people would end up having to take public transportation or rickshaws. But that undeniable fact of human history confirmed by about 6,000 years of empirical evidence is all out the door with this idiocracy. Factual though it is, it will always be uncommon knowledge as long as there are ambitious people in this nation who wish to rule over the masses. Be careful.
Have an emergency communications plan together because civil unrest is coming. See the volunteer program called The CB Patriot Project at http://www.cbpatriot.com/ Get involved now.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Pardon my Cynicism
by Thurston Howell
Pardon me for being cynical in the midst of the adulation for Barack Obama but I find it amazing how lefties love the military when one of their own controls it. If Bush were President right now, the left Democrats would be accusing him of “war crimes” for killing bin Laden without a trial.
To contend otherwise would be either utter delusion or deception. The shameless fact is undeniable; they protested our military and accused them all of killing innocent civilians, war crimes and just about everything abhorrent one can imagine – WHILE our troops were in harm's way, inciting the enemy to further anger which was followed up by Al Qaeda with a series of video-taped beheadings.
The fact is that if Bush had gone into Afghanistan first, their mantra would have been that “Bush should have gone into Iraq… but he botched it just like his daddy…” It never mattered how many troops these shameless reprobate lefties might have caused to be killed, the lives of our troops are and always have been mere campaign pawns to the Democrat Party.
It wasn't long ago that Obama was talking of our troops with typical leftist disdain as he basically said that people who are uneducated or have no other opportunities - join the military (instead of speaking of them with the reverence he should have as they have shed their blood by the hundreds of thousands so he and his leftist friends could protest them, kick them out of universities and accuse them of murdering innocent civilians for their own political gain).
Nothing will ever change my opinion that Barack Hussein Obama is a wicked deceiver, unworthy of admiration. He is an unscrupulous, two-faced opportunist who is eager to exploit popular turmoil at every opportunity.
--------------------------------------------
Have a communications plan BEFORE the inevitable consequences of their economic plunder hits the plan. Do not count on your Internet service and cell phone working when that day of reckoning arrives. http://www.cbPatriot.com is putting together a completely voluntary emergency COMMUNICATIONS plan called The CB Patriot Project. Ham Radio operators are encouraged to join as well.
by Thurston Howell
Pardon me for being cynical in the midst of the adulation for Barack Obama but I find it amazing how lefties love the military when one of their own controls it. If Bush were President right now, the left Democrats would be accusing him of “war crimes” for killing bin Laden without a trial.
To contend otherwise would be either utter delusion or deception. The shameless fact is undeniable; they protested our military and accused them all of killing innocent civilians, war crimes and just about everything abhorrent one can imagine – WHILE our troops were in harm's way, inciting the enemy to further anger which was followed up by Al Qaeda with a series of video-taped beheadings.
The fact is that if Bush had gone into Afghanistan first, their mantra would have been that “Bush should have gone into Iraq… but he botched it just like his daddy…” It never mattered how many troops these shameless reprobate lefties might have caused to be killed, the lives of our troops are and always have been mere campaign pawns to the Democrat Party.
It wasn't long ago that Obama was talking of our troops with typical leftist disdain as he basically said that people who are uneducated or have no other opportunities - join the military (instead of speaking of them with the reverence he should have as they have shed their blood by the hundreds of thousands so he and his leftist friends could protest them, kick them out of universities and accuse them of murdering innocent civilians for their own political gain).
Nothing will ever change my opinion that Barack Hussein Obama is a wicked deceiver, unworthy of admiration. He is an unscrupulous, two-faced opportunist who is eager to exploit popular turmoil at every opportunity.
--------------------------------------------
Have a communications plan BEFORE the inevitable consequences of their economic plunder hits the plan. Do not count on your Internet service and cell phone working when that day of reckoning arrives. http://www.cbPatriot.com is putting together a completely voluntary emergency COMMUNICATIONS plan called The CB Patriot Project. Ham Radio operators are encouraged to join as well.
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Suppose Obama WAS born in Kenya; then what?
- Thurston Howell
Barack Obama sent top advisor David Plouffe onto ABC's "This Week" to attempt to discredit Donald Trump on the matter of Obama's fight to avoid furnishing an actual birth certificate.
As my friend and scholar I.M. Kane at The Millstone Diaries recently wrote, “Trump knows that he could end up king or kingmaker if he succeeds in exposing the biggest fraud ever perpetuated on the people of the United States.”
I agree 100 percent and would like to add that even if Obama was born in the United States of America, I believe he is –still- the biggest fraud ever perpetrated against the United States by virtue of his conning millions of Dance with the Stars/American Idol consumed droids into believing that he is anything less than a radical communist.
Going back to the disturbing question of The Saboteur’s origins, Trump raises a valid point. It is surreal how he can spend millions of dollars to avoid furnishing this document. Seriously, in ANY CASE, shouldn’t the burden of proof (of origin) be on the person running for the highest position of the most powerful nation in the history of the world? It is beyond Orwellian that tens of millions of people will hand a virtual stranger the key to our entire nuclear arsenal and the most formidable military on the planet without even VERIFYING who the hell he is. That’s a friggin “BEAM ME UP SCOTTY” if I ever heard one and raises the question regarding the existence intelligent life here on this planet, at least in the blue states.
Ask anyone of the droids who voted for him and I GUARANTEE you that 99.9% of them have no idea of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is America’s first cocaine snorting (or crack smoking) President (by his own surreptitiously published auto-biography), not that most of these degenerates would necessarily care. When I think about it, as the birthplace qualification –has been in our constitution from the beginning and all, is it really that audacious to expect that maybe -whoever- wins a presidential primary should AUTOMATICALLY be required to furnish an ORIGINAL or at least an AUTHENTIC birth certificate? It’s not like we changed our Presidents every quarter for the past 235 years. I think we can make that extra effort.
The fact that “the administration” or should I say “the incessant campaign” sends us guys like that hatchet man on Sunday to make the discrediting rounds on his behalf speaks volumes. This smarmy character David Plouffe reminds me of “Harry Ellis” on the old Die Hard movie (with Bruce Willis). He typifies the type of Chicago style political hack that personifies the Saboteur's administration.
This should be taken seriously. If it should be determined at some point that Obama was born in Kenya and knowingly conspired against the people and the constitution of the United States of America - for all of the legislation promulgated and lawsuits having to be waged that never would have otherwise occurred, he should beyond a shadow of a doubt stand trial for treason. If convicted, he should suffer the concomitant penalty that always accompanies the crime of treason.
Impeachment would be entirely inadequate for such a crime. And since Obama likes by some stretch to link himself and everything he does to Abraham Lincoln, if convicted, perhaps as a tribute his sentence could be carried out at Fort Mcnair - the site where the penalty of conspiracy was carried out against those convicted as conspirators in President Lincoln’s assassination.
Everything should be conducted by the rule of law and an authentic birth certificate should be subpoenaed.
email: mrarbitrage@tableofwisdom.com
- Thurston Howell
Barack Obama sent top advisor David Plouffe onto ABC's "This Week" to attempt to discredit Donald Trump on the matter of Obama's fight to avoid furnishing an actual birth certificate.
As my friend and scholar I.M. Kane at The Millstone Diaries recently wrote, “Trump knows that he could end up king or kingmaker if he succeeds in exposing the biggest fraud ever perpetuated on the people of the United States.”
I agree 100 percent and would like to add that even if Obama was born in the United States of America, I believe he is –still- the biggest fraud ever perpetrated against the United States by virtue of his conning millions of Dance with the Stars/American Idol consumed droids into believing that he is anything less than a radical communist.
Going back to the disturbing question of The Saboteur’s origins, Trump raises a valid point. It is surreal how he can spend millions of dollars to avoid furnishing this document. Seriously, in ANY CASE, shouldn’t the burden of proof (of origin) be on the person running for the highest position of the most powerful nation in the history of the world? It is beyond Orwellian that tens of millions of people will hand a virtual stranger the key to our entire nuclear arsenal and the most formidable military on the planet without even VERIFYING who the hell he is. That’s a friggin “BEAM ME UP SCOTTY” if I ever heard one and raises the question regarding the existence intelligent life here on this planet, at least in the blue states.
Ask anyone of the droids who voted for him and I GUARANTEE you that 99.9% of them have no idea of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is America’s first cocaine snorting (or crack smoking) President (by his own surreptitiously published auto-biography), not that most of these degenerates would necessarily care. When I think about it, as the birthplace qualification –has been in our constitution from the beginning and all, is it really that audacious to expect that maybe -whoever- wins a presidential primary should AUTOMATICALLY be required to furnish an ORIGINAL or at least an AUTHENTIC birth certificate? It’s not like we changed our Presidents every quarter for the past 235 years. I think we can make that extra effort.
The fact that “the administration” or should I say “the incessant campaign” sends us guys like that hatchet man on Sunday to make the discrediting rounds on his behalf speaks volumes. This smarmy character David Plouffe reminds me of “Harry Ellis” on the old Die Hard movie (with Bruce Willis). He typifies the type of Chicago style political hack that personifies the Saboteur's administration.
This should be taken seriously. If it should be determined at some point that Obama was born in Kenya and knowingly conspired against the people and the constitution of the United States of America - for all of the legislation promulgated and lawsuits having to be waged that never would have otherwise occurred, he should beyond a shadow of a doubt stand trial for treason. If convicted, he should suffer the concomitant penalty that always accompanies the crime of treason.
Impeachment would be entirely inadequate for such a crime. And since Obama likes by some stretch to link himself and everything he does to Abraham Lincoln, if convicted, perhaps as a tribute his sentence could be carried out at Fort Mcnair - the site where the penalty of conspiracy was carried out against those convicted as conspirators in President Lincoln’s assassination.
 |
| Fort McNair (Lincoln assassination conspirators) |
Everything should be conducted by the rule of law and an authentic birth certificate should be subpoenaed.
email: mrarbitrage@tableofwisdom.com
Friday, April 8, 2011
Dennis Miller unloads on Nancy Pelosi by Thurston Howell I caught Dennis Miller on the O’Reilly Matter a couple nights back and Miller made a noteworthy dissertation regarding the disreputable tactics of Nancy Pelosi. He referred to Pelosi telling the nation that seniors are going to be meeting premature deaths due to Paul Ryan’s Budget proposal. I really have to take issue with Miller’s rant but before I do, take a minute to view it so we’re on the same page. Although this was for the most part accurate - and funny, I think that conservatives lose credibility when we make exaggerated statements like Miller’s claim about “Pelosi’s face being pulled tighter than Buddie Rich’s snare drum”. There is no need to use such hyperbole to get the point across. Any percussionist will tell you that there is -no way- you could stretch a snare drum head that tightly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
